summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2013-04-04Fix crash on compiling a regular expression with more than 32k colors.Heikki Linnakangas
Throw an error instead. Backpatch to all supported branches.
2013-03-31Translation updatesPeter Eisentraut
2013-03-31Translation updatesAlvaro Herrera
2013-03-27Reset OpenSSL randomness state in each postmaster child process.Tom Lane
Previously, if the postmaster initialized OpenSSL's PRNG (which it will do when ssl=on in postgresql.conf), the same pseudo-random state would be inherited by each forked child process. The problem is masked to a considerable extent if the incoming connection uses SSL encryption, but when it does not, identical pseudo-random state is made available to functions like contrib/pgcrypto. The process's PID does get mixed into any requested random output, but on most systems that still only results in 32K or so distinct random sequences available across all Postgres sessions. This might allow an attacker who has database access to guess the results of "secure" operations happening in another session. To fix, forcibly reset the PRNG after fork(). Each child process that has need for random numbers from OpenSSL's generator will thereby be forced to go through OpenSSL's normal initialization sequence, which should provide much greater variability of the sequences. There are other ways we might do this that would be slightly cheaper, but this approach seems the most future-proof against SSL-related code changes. This has been assigned CVE-2013-1900, but since the issue and the patch have already been publicized on pgsql-hackers, there's no point in trying to hide this commit. Back-patch to all supported branches. Marko Kreen
2013-03-07Fix infinite-loop risk in fixempties() stage of regex compilation.Tom Lane
The previous coding of this function could get into situations where it would never terminate, because successive passes would re-add EMPTY arcs that had been removed by the previous pass. Rewrite the function completely using a new algorithm that is guaranteed to terminate, and also seems to be usually faster than the old one. Per Tcl bugs 3604074 and 3606683. Tom Lane and Don Porter
2013-03-05Fix to_char() to use ASCII-only case-folding rules where appropriate.Tom Lane
formatting.c used locale-dependent case folding rules in some code paths where the result isn't supposed to be locale-dependent, for example to_char(timestamp, 'DAY'). Since the source data is always just ASCII in these cases, that usually didn't matter ... but it does matter in Turkish locales, which have unusual treatment of "i" and "I". To confuse matters even more, the misbehavior was only visible in UTF8 encoding, because in single-byte encodings we used pg_toupper/pg_tolower which don't have locale-specific behavior for ASCII characters. Fix by providing intentionally ASCII-only case-folding functions and using these where appropriate. Per bug #7913 from Adnan Dursun. Back-patch to all active branches, since it's been like this for a long time.
2013-03-04Fix overflow check in tm2timestamp (this time for sure).Tom Lane
I fixed this code back in commit 841b4a2d5, but didn't think carefully enough about the behavior near zero, which meant it improperly rejected 1999-12-31 24:00:00. Per report from Magnus Hagander.
2013-02-27Add missing error check in regexp parser.Tom Lane
parseqatom() failed to check for an error return (NULL result) from its recursive call to parsebranch(), and in consequence could crash with a null-pointer dereference after an error return. This bug has been there since day one, but wasn't noticed before, probably because most error cases in parsebranch() didn't actually lead to returning NULL. Add the missing error check, and also tweak parsebranch() to exit in a less indirect fashion after a call to parseqatom() fails. Report by Tomasz Karlik, fix by me.
2013-02-10Further cleanup of gistsplit.c.Tom Lane
After further reflection I was unconvinced that the existing coding is guaranteed to return valid union datums in every code path for multi-column indexes. Fix that by forcing a gistunionsubkey() call at the end of the recursion. Having done that, we can remove some clearly-redundant calls elsewhere. This should be a little faster for multi-column indexes (since the previous coding would uselessly do such a call for each column while unwinding the recursion), as well as much harder to break. Also, simplify the handling of cases where one side or the other of a primary split contains only don't-care tuples. The previous coding used a very ugly hack in removeDontCares() that essentially forced one random tuple to be treated as non-don't-care, providing a random initial choice of seed datum for the secondary split. It seems unlikely that that method will give better-than-random splits. Instead, treat such a split as degenerate and just let the next column determine the split, the same way that we handle fully degenerate cases where the two sides produce identical union datums.
2013-02-10Remove useless picksplit-doesn't-support-secondary-split log spam.Tom Lane
This LOG message was put in over five years ago with the evident expectation that we'd make all GiST opclasses support secondary split directly. However, no such thing ever happened, and indeed the number of opclasses supporting it decreased to zero in 9.2. The reason is that improving on the default implementation isn't that easy --- the opclass-specific code that did exist, before 9.2, doesn't appear to have been any improvement over the default. Hence, remove the message altogether. There's certainly no point in nagging users about this in released branches, but I doubt that we'll ever implement complete opclass-specific support anyway.
2013-02-10Document and clean up gistsplit.c.Tom Lane
Improve comments, rename some variables and functions, slightly simplify a couple of APIs, in an attempt to make this code readable by people other than its original author. Even though this is essentially just cosmetic, back-patch to all active branches, because otherwise it's going to make back-patching future fixes in this file very painful.
2013-02-08Fix gist_box_same and gist_point_consistent to handle fuzziness correctly.Tom Lane
While there's considerable doubt that we want fuzzy behavior in the geometric operators at all (let alone as currently implemented), nobody is stepping forward to redesign that stuff. In the meantime it behooves us to make sure that index searches agree with the behavior of the underlying operators. This patch fixes two problems in this area. First, gist_box_same was using fuzzy equality, but it really needs to use exact equality to prevent not-quite-identical upper index keys from being treated as identical, which for example would prevent an existing upper key from being extended by an amount less than epsilon. This would result in inconsistent indexes. (The next release notes will need to recommend that users reindex GiST indexes on boxes, polygons, circles, and points, since all four opclasses use gist_box_same.) Second, gist_point_consistent used exact comparisons for upper-page comparisons in ~= searches, when it needs to use fuzzy comparisons to ensure it finds all matches; and it used fuzzy comparisons for point <@ box searches, when it needs to use exact comparisons because that's what the <@ operator (rather inconsistently) does. The added regression test cases illustrate all three misbehaviors. Back-patch to all active branches. (8.4 did not have GiST point_ops, but it still seems prudent to apply the gist_box_same patch to it.) Alexander Korotkov, reviewed by Noah Misch
2013-02-07Repair bugs in GiST page splitting code for multi-column indexes.Tom Lane
When considering a non-last column in a multi-column GiST index, gistsplit.c tries to improve on the split chosen by the opclass-specific pickSplit function by considering penalties for the next column. However, there were two bugs in this code: it failed to recompute the union keys for the leftmost index columns, even though these might well change after reassigning tuples; and it included the old union keys in the recomputation for the columns it did recompute, so that those keys couldn't get smaller even if they should. The first problem could result in an invalid index in which searches wouldn't find index entries that are in fact present; the second would make the index less efficient to search. Both of these errors were caused by misuse of gistMakeUnionItVec, whose API was designed in a way that just begged such errors to be made. There is no situation in which it's safe or useful to compute the union keys for a subset of the index columns, and there is no caller that wants any previous union keys to be included in the computation; so the undocumented choice to treat the union keys as in/out rather than pure output parameters is a waste of code as well as being dangerous. Hence, rather than just making a minimal patch, I've changed the API of gistMakeUnionItVec to remove the "startkey" parameter (it now always processes all index columns) and treat the attr/isnull arrays as purely output parameters. In passing, also get rid of a couple of unnecessary and dangerous uses of static variables in gistutil.c. It's remarkable that the one in gistMakeUnionKey hasn't given us portability troubles before now, because in addition to posing a re-entrancy hazard, it was unsafely assuming that a static char[] array would have at least Datum alignment. Per investigation of a trouble report from Tomas Vondra. (There are also some bugs in contrib/btree_gist to be fixed, but that seems like material for a separate patch.) Back-patch to all supported branches.
2013-02-07Fix possible failure to send final transaction counts to stats collector.Tom Lane
Normally, we suppress sending a tabstats message to the collector unless there were some actual table stats to send. However, during backend exit we should force out the message if there are any transaction commit/abort counts to send, else the session's last few commit/abort counts will never get reported at all. We had logic for this, but the short-circuit test at the top of pgstat_report_stat() ignored the "force" flag, with the consequence that session-ending transactions that touched no database-local tables would not get counted. Seems to be an oversight in my commit 641912b4d17fd214a5e5bae4e7bb9ddbc28b144b, which added the "force" flag. That was back in 8.3, so back-patch to all supported versions.
2013-02-04Prevent execution of enum_recv() from SQL.Tom Lane
This function was misdeclared to take cstring when it should take internal. This at least allows crashing the server, and in principle an attacker might be able to use the function to examine the contents of server memory. The correct fix is to adjust the system catalog contents (and fix the regression tests that should have caught this but failed to). However, asking users to correct the catalog contents in existing installations is a pain, so as a band-aid fix for the back branches, install a check in enum_recv() to make it throw error if called with a cstring argument. We will later revert this in HEAD in favor of correcting the catalogs. Our thanks to Sumit Soni (via Secunia SVCRP) for reporting this issue. Security: CVE-2013-0255
2013-02-03Translation updatesPeter Eisentraut
2013-02-01Fix typo in freeze_table_age implementationAlvaro Herrera
The original code used freeze_min_age instead of freeze_table_age. The main consequence of this mistake is that lowering freeze_min_age would cause full-table scans to occur much more frequently, which causes serious issues because the number of writes required is much larger. That feature (freeze_min_age) is supposed to affect only how soon tuples are frozen; some pages should still be skipped due to the visibility map. Backpatch to 8.4, where the freeze_table_age feature was introduced. Report and patch from Andres Freund
2013-01-30Fix grammar for subscripting or field selection from a sub-SELECT result.Tom Lane
Such cases should work, but the grammar failed to accept them because of our ancient precedence hacks to convince bison that extra parentheses around a sub-SELECT in an expression are unambiguous. (Formally, they *are* ambiguous, but we don't especially care whether they're treated as part of the sub-SELECT or part of the expression. Bison cares, though.) Fix by adding a redundant-looking production for this case. This is a fine example of why fixing shift/reduce conflicts via precedence declarations is more dangerous than it looks: you can easily cause the parser to reject cases that should work. This has been wrong since commit 3db4056e22b0c6b2adc92543baf8408d2894fe91 or maybe before, and apparently some people have been working around it by inserting no-op casts. That method introduces a dump/reload hazard, as illustrated in bug #7838 from Jan Mate. Hence, back-patch to all active branches.
2013-01-28DROP OWNED: don't try to drop tablespaces/databasesAlvaro Herrera
My "fix" for bugs #7578 and #6116 on DROP OWNED at fe3b5eb08a1 not only misstated that it applied to REASSIGN OWNED (which it did not affect), but it also failed to fix the problems fully, because I didn't test the case of owned shared objects. Thus I created a new bug, reported by Thomas Kellerer as #7748, which would cause DROP OWNED to fail with a not-for-user-consumption error message. The code would attempt to drop the database, which not only fails to work because the underlying code does not support that, but is a pretty dangerous and undesirable thing to be doing as well. This patch fixes that bug by having DROP OWNED only attempt to process shared objects when grants on them are found, ignoring ownership. Backpatch to 8.3, which is as far as the previous bug was backpatched.
2013-01-18Protect against SnapshotNow race conditions in pg_tablespace scans.Tom Lane
Use of SnapshotNow is known to expose us to race conditions if the tuple(s) being sought could be updated by concurrently-committing transactions. CREATE DATABASE and DROP DATABASE are particularly exposed because they do heavyweight filesystem operations during their scans of pg_tablespace, so that the scans run for a very long time compared to most. Furthermore, the potential consequences of a missed or twice-visited row are nastier than average: * createdb() could fail with a bogus "file already exists" error, or silently fail to copy one or more tablespace's worth of files into the new database. * remove_dbtablespaces() could miss one or more tablespaces, thus failing to free filesystem space for the dropped database. * check_db_file_conflict() could likewise miss a tablespace, leading to an OID conflict that could result in data loss either immediately or in future operations. (This seems of very low probability, though, since a duplicate database OID would be unlikely to start with.) Hence, it seems worth fixing these three places to use MVCC snapshots, even though this will someday be superseded by a generic solution to SnapshotNow race conditions. Back-patch to all active branches. Stephen Frost and Tom Lane
2013-01-14Reject out-of-range dates in to_date().Tom Lane
Dates outside the supported range could be entered, but would not print reasonably, and operations such as conversion to timestamp wouldn't behave sanely either. Since this has the potential to result in undumpable table data, it seems worth back-patching. Hitoshi Harada
2012-12-23Prevent failure when RowExpr or XmlExpr is parse-analyzed twice.Tom Lane
transformExpr() is required to cope with already-transformed expression trees, for various ugly-but-not-quite-worth-cleaning-up reasons. However, some of its newer subroutines hadn't gotten the memo. This accounts for bug #7763 from Norbert Buchmuller: transformRowExpr() was overwriting the previously determined type of a RowExpr during CREATE TABLE LIKE INCLUDING INDEXES. Additional investigation showed that transformXmlExpr had the same kind of problem, but all the other cases seem to be safe. Andres Freund and Tom Lane
2012-12-11Add defenses against integer overflow in dynahash numbuckets calculations.Tom Lane
The dynahash code requires the number of buckets in a hash table to fit in an int; but since we calculate the desired hash table size dynamically, there are various scenarios where we might calculate too large a value. The resulting overflow can lead to infinite loops, division-by-zero crashes, etc. I (tgl) had previously installed some defenses against that in commit 299d1716525c659f0e02840e31fbe4dea3, but that covered only one call path. Moreover it worked by limiting the request size to work_mem, but in a 64-bit machine it's possible to set work_mem high enough that the problem appears anyway. So let's fix the problem at the root by installing limits in the dynahash.c functions themselves. Trouble report and patch by Jeff Davis.
2012-12-10Update minimum recovery point on truncation.Heikki Linnakangas
If a file is truncated, we must update minRecoveryPoint. Once a file is truncated, there's no going back; it would not be safe to stop recovery at a point earlier than that anymore. Per report from Kyotaro HORIGUCHI. Backpatch to 8.4. Before that, minRecoveryPoint was not updated during recovery at all.
2012-12-03Avoid holding vmbuffer pin after VACUUM.Simon Riggs
During VACUUM if we pause to perform a cycle of index cleanup we drop the vmbuffer pin, so we should do the same thing when heap scan completes. This avoids holding vmbuffer pin across the main index cleanup in VACUUM, which could be minutes or hours longer than necessary for correctness. Bug report and suggested fix from Pavan Deolasee
2012-12-03Translation updatesPeter Eisentraut
2012-11-30Add missing buffer lock acquisition in GetTupleForTrigger().Tom Lane
If we had not been holding buffer pin continuously since the tuple was initially fetched by the UPDATE or DELETE query, it would be possible for VACUUM or a page-prune operation to move the tuple while we're trying to copy it. This would result in a garbage "old" tuple value being passed to an AFTER ROW UPDATE or AFTER ROW DELETE trigger. The preconditions for this are somewhat improbable, and the timing constraints are very tight; so it's not so surprising that this hasn't been reported from the field, even though the bug has been there a long time. Problem found by Andres Freund. Back-patch to all active branches.
2012-11-29Produce a more useful error message for over-length Unix socket paths.Tom Lane
The length of a socket path name is constrained by the size of struct sockaddr_un, and there's not a lot we can do about it since that is a kernel API. However, it would be a good thing if we produced an intelligible error message when the user specifies a socket path that's too long --- and getaddrinfo's standard API is too impoverished to do this in the natural way. So insert explicit tests at the places where we construct a socket path name. Now you'll get an error that makes sense and even tells you what the limit is, rather than something generic like "Non-recoverable failure in name resolution". Per trouble report from Jeremy Drake and a fix idea from Andrew Dunstan.
2012-11-29Fix assorted bugs in CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY.Tom Lane
This patch changes CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY so that the pg_index flag changes it makes without exclusive lock on the index are made via heap_inplace_update() rather than a normal transactional update. The latter is not very safe because moving the pg_index tuple could result in concurrent SnapshotNow scans finding it twice or not at all, thus possibly resulting in index corruption. In addition, fix various places in the code that ought to check to make sure that the indexes they are manipulating are valid and/or ready as appropriate. These represent bugs that have existed since 8.2, since a failed CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY could leave a corrupt or invalid index behind, and we ought not try to do anything that might fail with such an index. Also fix RelationReloadIndexInfo to ensure it copies all the pg_index columns that are allowed to change after initial creation. Previously we could have been left with stale values of some fields in an index relcache entry. It's not clear whether this actually had any user-visible consequences, but it's at least a bug waiting to happen. This is a subset of a patch already applied in 9.2 and HEAD. Back-patch into all earlier supported branches. Tom Lane and Andres Freund
2012-11-19Improve handling of INT_MIN / -1 and related cases.Tom Lane
Some platforms throw an exception for this division, rather than returning a necessarily-overflowed result. Since we were testing for overflow after the fact, an exception isn't nice. We can avoid the problem by treating division by -1 as negation. Add some regression tests so that we'll find out if any compilers try to optimize away the overflow check conditions. Back-patch of commit 1f7cb5c30983752ff8de833de30afcaee63536d0. Per discussion with Xi Wang, though this is different from the patch he submitted.
2012-11-18Limit values of archive_timeout, post_auth_delay, auth_delay.milliseconds.Tom Lane
The previous definitions of these GUC variables allowed them to range up to INT_MAX, but in point of fact the underlying code would suffer overflows or other errors with large values. Reduce the maximum values to something that won't misbehave. There's no apparent value in working harder than this, since very large delays aren't sensible for any of these. (Note: the risk with archive_timeout is that if we're late checking the state, the timestamp difference it's being compared to might overflow. So we need some amount of slop; the choice of INT_MAX/2 is arbitrary.) Per followup investigation of bug #7670. Although this isn't a very significant fix, might as well back-patch.
2012-11-14Fix the int8 and int2 cases of (minimum possible integer) % (-1).Tom Lane
The correct answer for this (or any other case with arg2 = -1) is zero, but some machines throw a floating-point exception instead of behaving sanely. Commit f9ac414c35ea084ff70c564ab2c32adb06d5296f dealt with this in int4mod, but overlooked the fact that it also happens in int8mod (at least on my Linux x86_64 machine). Protect int2mod as well; it's not clear whether any machines fail there (mine does not) but since the test is so cheap it seems better safe than sorry. While at it, simplify the original guard in int4mod: we need only check for arg2 == -1, we don't need to check arg1 explicitly. Xi Wang, with some editing by me.
2012-11-13Fix memory leaks in record_out() and record_send().Tom Lane
record_out() leaks memory: it fails to free the strings returned by the per-column output functions, and also is careless about detoasted values. This results in a query-lifespan memory leakage when returning composite values to the client, because printtup() runs the output functions in the query-lifespan memory context. Fix it to handle these issues the same way printtup() does. Also fix a similar leakage in record_send(). (At some point we might want to try to run output functions in shorter-lived memory contexts, so that we don't need a zero-leakage policy for them. But that would be a significantly more invasive patch, which doesn't seem like material for back-patching.) In passing, use appendStringInfoCharMacro instead of appendStringInfoChar in the innermost data-copying loop of record_out, to try to shave a few cycles from this function's runtime. Per trouble report from Carlos Henrique Reimer. Back-patch to all supported versions.
2012-11-11Check for stack overflow in transformSetOperationTree().Tom Lane
Since transformSetOperationTree() recurses, it can be driven to stack overflow with enough UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT clauses in a query. Add a check to ensure it fails cleanly instead of crashing. Per report from Matthew Gerber (though it's not clear whether this is the only thing going wrong for him). Historical note: I think the reasoning behind not putting a check here in the beginning was that the check in transformExpr() ought to be sufficient to guard the whole parser. However, because transformSetOperationTree() recurses all the way to the bottom of the set-operation tree before doing any analysis of the statement's expressions, that check doesn't save it.
2012-11-05Fix handling of inherited check constraints in ALTER COLUMN TYPE.Tom Lane
This case got broken in 8.4 by the addition of an error check that complains if ALTER TABLE ONLY is used on a table that has children. We do use ONLY for this situation, but it's okay because the necessary recursion occurs at a higher level. So we need to have a separate flag to suppress recursion without making the error check. Reported and patched by Pavan Deolasee, with some editorial adjustments by me. Back-patch to 8.4, since this is a regression of functionality that worked in earlier branches.
2012-10-26Prefer actual constants to pseudo-constants in equivalence class machinery.Tom Lane
generate_base_implied_equalities_const() should prefer plain Consts over other em_is_const eclass members when choosing the "pivot" value that all the other members will be equated to. This makes it more likely that the generated equalities will be useful in constraint-exclusion proofs. Per report from Rushabh Lathia.
2012-10-24Prevent parser from believing that views have system columns.Tom Lane
Views should not have any pg_attribute entries for system columns. However, we forgot to remove such entries when converting a table to a view. This could lead to crashes later on, if someone attempted to reference such a column, as reported by Kohei KaiGai. This problem is corrected properly in HEAD (by removing the pg_attribute entries during conversion), but in the back branches we need to defend against existing mis-converted views. This fix costs us an extra syscache lookup per system column reference, which is annoying but probably not really measurable in the big scheme of things.
2012-10-19Fix hash_search to avoid corruption of the hash table on out-of-memory.Tom Lane
An out-of-memory error during expand_table() on a palloc-based hash table would leave a partially-initialized entry in the table. This would not be harmful for transient hash tables, since they'd get thrown away anyway at transaction abort. But for long-lived hash tables, such as the relcache hash, this would effectively corrupt the table, leading to crash or other misbehavior later. To fix, rearrange the order of operations so that table enlargement is attempted before we insert a new entry, rather than after adding it to the hash table. Problem discovered by Hitoshi Harada, though this is a bit different from his proposed patch.
2012-10-19Fix ruleutils to print "INSERT INTO foo DEFAULT VALUES" correctly.Tom Lane
Per bug #7615 from Marko Tiikkaja. Apparently nobody ever tried this case before ...
2012-10-18Fix planning of non-strict equivalence clauses above outer joins.Tom Lane
If a potential equivalence clause references a variable from the nullable side of an outer join, the planner needs to take care that derived clauses are not pushed to below the outer join; else they may use the wrong value for the variable. (The problem arises only with non-strict clauses, since if an upper clause can be proven strict then the outer join will get simplified to a plain join.) The planner attempted to prevent this type of error by checking that potential equivalence clauses aren't outerjoin-delayed as a whole, but actually we have to check each side separately, since the two sides of the clause will get moved around separately if it's treated as an equivalence. Bugs of this type can be demonstrated as far back as 7.4, even though releases before 8.3 had only a very ad-hoc notion of equivalence clauses. In addition, we neglected to account for the possibility that such clauses might have nonempty nullable_relids even when not outerjoin-delayed; so the equivalence-class machinery lacked logic to compute correct nullable_relids values for clauses it constructs. This oversight was harmless before 9.2 because we were only using RestrictInfo.nullable_relids for OR clauses; but as of 9.2 it could result in pushing constructed equivalence clauses to incorrect places. (This accounts for bug #7604 from Bill MacArthur.) Fix the first problem by adding a new test check_equivalence_delay() in distribute_qual_to_rels, and fix the second one by adding code in equivclass.c and called functions to set correct nullable_relids for generated clauses. Although I believe the second part of this is not currently necessary before 9.2, I chose to back-patch it anyway, partly to keep the logic similar across branches and partly because it seems possible we might find other reasons why we need valid values of nullable_relids in the older branches. Add regression tests illustrating these problems. In 9.0 and up, also add test cases checking that we can push constants through outer joins, since we've broken that optimization before and I nearly broke it again with an overly simplistic patch for this problem.
2012-10-11Fix cross-type case in partial row matching for hashed subplans.Tom Lane
When hashing a subplan like "WHERE (a, b) NOT IN (SELECT x, y FROM ...)", findPartialMatch() attempted to match rows using the hashtable's internal equality operators, which of course are for x and y's datatypes. What we need to use are the potentially cross-type operators for a=x, b=y, etc. Failure to do that leads to wrong answers or even crashes. The scope for problems is limited to cases where we have different types with compatible hash functions (else we'd not be using a hashed subplan), but for example int4 vs int8 can cause the problem. Per bug #7597 from Bo Jensen. This has been wrong since the hashed-subplan code was written, so patch all the way back.
2012-10-09Fix PGXS support for building loadable modules on AIX.Tom Lane
Building a shlib on AIX requires use of the mkldexport.sh script, but we failed to install that, preventing its use from non-source-tree contexts. Also, Makefile.aix had the wrong idea about where to find the installed copy of the postgres.imp symbol file used by AIX. Per report from John Pierce. Patch all the way back, since this has been broken since the beginning of PGXS.
2012-10-03REASSIGN OWNED: consider grants on tablespaces, tooAlvaro Herrera
Apparently this was considered in the original code (see commit cec3b0a9) but I failed to notice that such entries would always be skipped by the database check at the start of the loop. Per bugs #7578 by Nikolay, #6116 by tushar.qa@gmail.com.
2012-10-02Fix access past end of string in date parsing.Heikki Linnakangas
This affects date_in(), and a couple of other funcions that use DecodeDate(). Hitoshi Harada
2012-09-19Translation updatesPeter Eisentraut
2012-09-07Fix PARAM_EXEC assignment mechanism to be safe in the presence of WITH.Tom Lane
The planner previously assumed that parameter Vars having the same absolute query level, varno, and varattno could safely be assigned the same runtime PARAM_EXEC slot, even though they might be different Vars appearing in different subqueries. This was (probably) safe before the introduction of CTEs, but the lazy-evalution mechanism used for CTEs means that a CTE can be executed during execution of some other subquery, causing the lifespan of Params at the same syntactic nesting level as the CTE to overlap with use of the same slots inside the CTE. In 9.1 we created additional hazards by using the same parameter-assignment technology for nestloop inner scan parameters, but it was broken before that, as illustrated by the added regression test. To fix, restructure the planner's management of PlannerParamItems so that items having different semantic lifespans are kept rigorously separated. This will probably result in complex queries using more runtime PARAM_EXEC slots than before, but the slots are cheap enough that this hardly matters. Also, stop generating PlannerParamItems containing Params for subquery outputs: all we really need to do is reserve the PARAM_EXEC slot number, and that now only takes incrementing a counter. The planning code is simpler and probably faster than before, as well as being more correct. Per report from Vik Reykja. Back-patch of commit 46c508fbcf98ac334f1e831d21021d731c882fbb into all branches that support WITH.
2012-08-30Back-patch recent fixes for gistchoose and gistRelocateBuildBuffersOnSplit.Tom Lane
This back-ports commits c8ba697a4bdb934f0c51424c654e8db6133ea255 and e5db11c5582b469c04a11f217a0f32c827da5dd7, which fix one definite and one speculative bug in gistchoose, and make the code a lot more intelligible as well. In 9.2 only, this also affects the largely-copied-and-pasted logic in gistRelocateBuildBuffersOnSplit. The impact of the bugs was that the functions might make poor decisions as to which index tree branch to push a new entry down into, resulting in GiST index bloat and poor performance. The fixes rectify these decisions for future insertions, but a REINDEX would be needed to clean up any existing index bloat. Alexander Korotkov, Robert Haas, Tom Lane
2012-08-30Add missing period to detail message.Robert Haas
Per note from Peter Eisentraut.
2012-08-23Fix cascading privilege revoke to notice when privileges are still held.Tom Lane
If we revoke a grant option from some role X, but X still holds the option via another grant, we should not recursively revoke the privilege from role(s) Y that X had granted it to. This was supposedly fixed as one aspect of commit 4b2dafcc0b1a579ef5daaa2728223006d1ff98e9, but I must not have tested it, because in fact that code never worked: it forgot to shift the grant-option bits back over when masking the bits being revoked. Per bug #6728 from Daniel German. Back-patch to all active branches, since this has been wrong since 8.0.
2012-08-15Fix rescan logic in nodeCtescan.Tom Lane
The previous coding essentially assumed that nodes would be rescanned in the same order they were initialized in; or at least that the "leader" of a group of CTEscans would be rescanned before any others were required to execute. Unfortunately, that isn't even a little bit true. It's possible to devise queries in which the leader isn't rescanned until other CTEscans on the same CTE have run to completion, or even in which the leader never gets a rescan call at all. The fix makes the leader specially responsible only for initial creation and final destruction of the tuplestore; rescan resets are now a symmetrically shared responsibility. This means that we might reset the tuplestore multiple times when restarting a plan subtree containing multiple CTEscans; but resetting an already-empty tuplestore is cheap enough that that doesn't seem like a problem. Per report from Adam Mackler; the new regression test cases are based on his example query. Back-patch to 8.4 where CTE scans were introduced.