| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Backpatch-through: 14
|
|
This commit adds a new "void *arg" parameter to
GetNamedDSMSegment() that is passed to the initialization callback
function. This is useful for reusing an initialization callback
function for multiple DSM segments.
Author: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>
Reviewed-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAN4CZFMjh8TrT9ZhWgjVTzBDkYZi2a84BnZ8bM%2BfLPuq7Cirzg%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
Since this is a test module, leaking a couple of LWLock tranches is
fine, but we want to discourage that pattern in third-party code.
This commit teaches the module to create only one tranche and to
store its ID in shared memory for use by other backends.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/dd36d384-55df-4fc2-825c-5bc56c950fa9%40gmail.com
|
|
There are two ways for shared libraries to allocate their own
LWLock tranches. One way is to call RequestNamedLWLockTranche() in
a shmem_request_hook, which requires the library to be loaded via
shared_preload_libraries. The other way is to call
LWLockNewTrancheId(), which is not subject to the same
restrictions. However, LWLockNewTrancheId() does require each
backend to store the tranche's name in backend-local memory via
LWLockRegisterTranche(). This API is a little cumbersome and leads
to things like unhelpful pg_stat_activity.wait_event values in
backends that haven't loaded the library.
This commit moves these LWLock tranche names to shared memory, thus
eliminating the need for each backend to call
LWLockRegisterTranche(). Instead, the tranche name must be
provided to LWLockNewTrancheId(), which immediately makes the name
available to all backends. Since the tranche name array is
append-only, lookups can ordinarily avoid locking as long as their
local copy of the LWLock counter is greater than the requested
tranche ID.
One downside of this approach is that we now have a hard limit on
both the length of tranche names (NAMEDATALEN-1 bytes) and the
number of dynamically-allocated tranches (256). Besides a limit of
NAMEDATALEN-1 bytes for tranche names registered via
RequestNamedLWLockTranche(), no such limits previously existed. We
could avoid these new limits by using dynamic shared memory, but
the complexity involved didn't seem worth it. We briefly
considered making the tranche limit user-configurable but
ultimately decided against that, too. Since there is still a lot
of time left in the v19 development cycle, it's possible we will
revisit this choice.
Author: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA5RZ0vvED3naph8My8Szv6DL4AxOVK3eTPS0qXsaKi%3DbVdW2A%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Similar to commit 7e735035f20.
Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAMbWs4-WhpCFMbXCjtJ%2BFzmjfPrp7Hw1pk4p%2BZpU95Kh3ofZ1A%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
Reported-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZZKTDPxBBMt3C0J9@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 12
|
|
Without this, "git status" is unhappy after a check-world run.
Oversight in 325f54033.
|
|
This covers basic calls within a single backend process, and also
calling dsa_allocate() or dsa_get_address() while in a different
resource owners. The latter case was fixed by the previous commit.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/11b70743-c5f3-3910-8e5b-dd6c115ff829%40gmail.com
|
