| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The logical replication parallel apply worker could incorrectly advance
the origin progress during an error or failed apply. This behavior risks
transaction loss because such transactions will not be resent by the
server.
Commit 3f28b2fcac addressed a similar issue for both the apply worker and
the table sync worker by registering a before_shmem_exit callback to reset
origin information. This prevents the worker from advancing the origin
during transaction abortion on shutdown. This patch applies the same fix
to the parallel apply worker, ensuring consistent behavior across all
worker types.
As with 3f28b2fcac, we are backpatching through version 16, since parallel
apply mode was introduced there and the issue only occurs when changes are
applied before the transaction end record (COMMIT or ABORT) is received.
Author: Hou Zhijie <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 16
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TY4PR01MB169078771FB31B395AB496A6B94B4A@TY4PR01MB16907.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TYAPR01MB5692FAC23BE40C69DA8ED4AFF5B92@TYAPR01MB5692.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
Previously logical decoding required wal_level to be set to 'logical'
at server start. This meant that users had to incur the overhead of
logical-level WAL logging even when no logical replication slots were
in use.
This commit adds functionality to automatically control logical
decoding availability based on logical replication slot presence. The
newly introduced module logicalctl.c allows logical decoding to be
dynamically activated when needed when wal_level is set to
'replica'.
When the first logical replication slot is created, the system
automatically increases the effective WAL level to maintain
logical-level WAL records. Conversely, after the last logical slot is
dropped or invalidated, it decreases back to 'replica' WAL level.
While activation occurs synchronously right after creating the first
logical slot, deactivation happens asynchronously through the
checkpointer process. This design avoids a race condition at the end
of recovery; a concurrent deactivation could happen while the startup
process enables logical decoding at the end of recovery, but WAL
writes are still not permitted until recovery fully completes. The
checkpointer will handle it after recovery is done. Asynchronous
deactivation also avoids excessive toggling of the logical decoding
status in workloads that repeatedly create and drop a single logical
slot. On the other hand, this lazy approach can delay changes to
effective_wal_level and the disabling logical decoding, especially
when the checkpointer is busy with other tasks. We chose this lazy
approach in all deactivation paths to keep the implementation simple,
even though laziness is strictly required only for end-of-recovery
cases. Future work might address this limitation either by using a
dedicated worker instead of the checkpointer, or by implementing
synchronous waiting during slot drops if workloads are significantly
affected by the lazy deactivation of logical decoding.
The effective WAL level, determined internally by XLogLogicalInfo, is
allowed to change within a transaction until an XID is assigned. Once
an XID is assigned, the value becomes fixed for the remainder of the
transaction. This behavior ensures that the logging mode remains
consistent within a writing transaction, similar to the behavior of
GUC parameters.
A new read-only GUC parameter effective_wal_level is introduced to
monitor the actual WAL level in effect. This parameter reflects the
current operational WAL level, which may differ from the configured
wal_level setting.
Bump PG_CONTROL_VERSION as it adds a new field to CheckPoint struct.
Reviewed-by: Shveta Malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoCVLeLYq09pQPaWs+Jwdni5FuJ8v2jgq-u9_uFbcp6UbA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Since ce0fdbfe9722, a replication slot and an origin are created by each
tablesync worker, whose information is stored in both a catalog and
shared memory (once the origin is set up in the latter case). The
transaction where the origin is created is the same as the one that runs
the initial COPY, with the catalog state of the origin becoming visible
for other sessions only once the COPY transaction has committed. The
catalog state is coupled with a state in shared memory, initialized at
the same time as the origin created in the catalogs. Note that the
transaction doing the initial data sync can take a long time, time that
depends on the amount of data to transfer from a publication node to its
subscriber node.
Now, when a DROP SUBSCRIPTION is executed, all its workers are stopped
with the origins removed. The removal of each origin relies on a
catalog lookup. A worker still running the initial COPY would fail its
transaction, with the catalog state of the origin rolled back while the
shared memory state remains around. The session running the DROP
SUBSCRIPTION should be in charge of cleaning up the catalog and the
shared memory state, but as there is no data in the catalogs the shared
memory state is not removed. This issue would leave orphaned origin
data in shared memory, leading to a confusing state as it would still
show up in pg_replication_origin_status. Note that this shared memory
data is sticky, being flushed on disk in replorigin_checkpoint at
checkpoint. This prevents other origins from reusing a slot position
in the shared memory data.
To address this problem, the commit moves the creation of the origin at
the end of the transaction that precedes the one executing the initial
COPY, making the origin immediately visible in the catalogs for other
sessions, giving DROP SUBSCRIPTION a way to know about it. A different
solution would have been to clean up the shared memory state using an
abort callback within the tablesync worker. The solution of this commit
is more consistent with the apply worker that creates an origin in a
short transaction.
A test is added in the subscription test 004_sync.pl, which was able to
display the problem. The test fails when this commit is reverted.
Reported-by: Tenglong Gu <brucegu@amazon.com>
Reported-by: Daisuke Higuchi <higudai@amazon.com>
Analyzed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Author: Hou Zhijie <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aUTekQTg4OYnw-Co@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 14
|
|
This patch renames the sync_error_count column to sync_table_error_count
in the pg_stat_subscription_stats view. The new name makes the purpose
explicit now that a separate column exists to track sequence
synchronization errors.
Additionally, the column seq_sync_error_count is renamed to
sync_seq_error_count to maintain a consistent naming pattern, making it
easier for users to group, and query synchronization related counters.
Author: Vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm3WwJmz=-4ybTkhniB-Nf3qmFG9Zx1uKjyLLoPF5NYYXA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This commit adds a new column, seq_sync_error_count, to the
pg_stat_subscription_stats view. This counter tracks the number of errors
encountered by the sequence synchronization worker during operation.
Since a single worker handles the synchronization of all sequences, this
value may reflect errors from multiple sequences. This addition improves
observability of sequence synchronization behavior and helps monitor
potential issues during replication.
Author: Vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1LC+KJiAkSrpE_NwvNdidw9F2os7GERUeSxSKv71gXysQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Test failure on buildfarm member prion:
The test failed due to an unexpected LOCATION: line appearing between the
WARNING and ERROR messages. This occurred because the prion machine uses
log_error_verbosity = verbose, which includes additional context in error
messages. The test was originally checking for both WARNING and ERROR
messages in sequence sync, but the extra LOCATION: line disrupted this
pattern. To make the test robust across different verbosity settings, it
now only checks for the presence of the WARNING message after the test,
which is sufficient to validate the intended behavior.
Failure to sync sequences with quoted names:
The previous implementation did not correctly quote sequence names when
querying remote information, leading to failures when quoted sequence
names were used. This fix ensures that sequence names are properly quoted
during remote queries, allowing sequences with quoted identifiers to be
synced correctly.
Author: Vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Author: Shinya Kato <shinya11.kato@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm0WcdSCoNPiE-5ek4J2dMJ5o111GPTzKCYj9G5i=ONYtQ@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOzEurQOSN=Zcp9uVnatNbAy=2WgMTJn_DYszYjv0KUeQX_e_A@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This patch introduces sequence synchronization. Sequences that are synced
will have 2 states:
- INIT (needs [re]synchronizing)
- READY (is already synchronized)
A new sequencesync worker is launched as needed to synchronize sequences.
A single sequencesync worker is responsible for synchronizing all
sequences. It begins by retrieving the list of sequences that are flagged
for synchronization, i.e., those in the INIT state. These sequences are
then processed in batches, allowing multiple entries to be synchronized
within a single transaction. The worker fetches the current sequence
values and page LSNs from the remote publisher, updates the corresponding
sequences on the local subscriber, and finally marks each sequence as
READY upon successful synchronization.
Sequence synchronization occurs in 3 places:
1) CREATE SUBSCRIPTION
- The command syntax remains unchanged.
- The subscriber retrieves sequences associated with publications.
- Published sequences are added to pg_subscription_rel with INIT
state.
- Initiate the sequencesync worker to synchronize all sequences.
2) ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH PUBLICATION
- The command syntax remains unchanged.
- Dropped published sequences are removed from pg_subscription_rel.
- Newly published sequences are added to pg_subscription_rel with INIT
state.
- Initiate the sequencesync worker to synchronize only newly added
sequences.
3) ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH SEQUENCES
- A new command introduced for PG19 by f0b3573c3a.
- All sequences in pg_subscription_rel are reset to INIT state.
- Initiate the sequencesync worker to synchronize all sequences.
- Unlike "ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH PUBLICATION" command,
addition and removal of missing sequences will not be done in this
case.
Author: Vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hou Zhijie <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1LC+KJiAkSrpE_NwvNdidw9F2os7GERUeSxSKv71gXysQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Ensure that the target table on the subscriber exists before executing any
DML intended for replication.
Currently, if the table is missing, the replication logic keeps retrying
until the table is eventually created by the test. Although this behaviour
does not cause test failures, since the table is created after the INSERT
is published and replication eventually succeeds, however, it introduces
unnecessary looping and delays.
Author: Grem Snoort <grem.snoort@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANV9Qw5HD7=Fp4nox2O7DoVctHoabRRVW9Soo4A=QipqW5B=Tg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This patch adds support for a new SQL command:
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH SEQUENCES
This command updates the sequence entries present in the
pg_subscription_rel catalog table with the INIT state to trigger
resynchronization.
In addition to the new command, the following subscription commands have
been enhanced to automatically refresh sequence mappings:
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH PUBLICATION
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... ADD PUBLICATION
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... DROP PUBLICATION
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SET PUBLICATION
These commands will perform the following actions:
Add newly published sequences that are not yet part of the subscription.
Remove sequences that are no longer included in the publication.
This ensures that sequence replication remains aligned with the current
state of the publication on the publisher side.
Note that the actual synchronization of sequence data/values will be
handled in a subsequent patch that introduces a dedicated sequence sync
worker.
Author: Vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hou Zhijie <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1LC+KJiAkSrpE_NwvNdidw9F2os7GERUeSxSKv71gXysQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The TAP tests whose ok() calls are changed in this commit were relying
on perl operators, rather than equivalents available in Test::More. For
example, rather than the following:
ok($data =~ qr/expr/m, "expr matching");
ok($data !~ qr/expr/m, "expr not matching");
The new test code uses this equivalent:
like($data, qr/expr/m, "expr matching");
unlike($data, qr/expr/m, "expr not matching");
A huge benefit of the new formulation is that it is possible to know
about the values we are checking if a failure happens, making debugging
easier, should the test runs happen in the buildfarm, in the CI or
locally.
This change leads to more test code overall as perltidy likes to make
the code pretty the way it is in this commit.
Author: Sadhuprasad Patro <b.sadhu@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFF0-CHhwNx_Cv2uy7tKjODUbeOgPrJpW4Rpf1jqB16_1bU2sg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Based on suggestions by Tom Lane
Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20250916.114644.275726106301941878.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
|
|
This commit addresses two sources of instability in the 035_conflicts
test:
Unstable VACUUM usage:
The test previously relied on VACUUM to remove a deleted column, which can
be unreliable due to concurrent background writer or checkpoint activity
that may lock the page containing the deleted tuple. Since the test
already verifies that replication_slot.xmin has advanced sufficiently to
confirm the feature's correctness, so, the VACUUM step is removed to
improve test stability.
Timing-sensitive retention resumption check:
The test includes a check to confirm that retention of conflict-relevant
information resumes after setting max_retention_duration to 0. However, in
some cases, the apply worker resumes retention immediately after the
inactive slot is removed from synchronized_standby_slots, even before
max_retention_duration is updated. This can happen if remote changes are
applied in under 1ms, causing the test to timeout while waiting for a
later log position. To ensure consistent behavior, this commit delays the
removal of synchronized_standby_slots until after max_retention_duration
is set to 0.
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TY4PR01MB16907805DE4816E53C54708159414A@TY4PR01MB16907.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
This commit resumes automatic retention of conflict-relevant data for a
subscription. Previously, retention would stop if the apply process failed
to advance its xmin (oldest_nonremovable_xid) within the configured
max_retention_duration and user needs to manually re-enable
retain_dead_tuples option. With this change, retention will resume
automatically once the apply worker catches up and begins advancing its
xmin (oldest_nonremovable_xid) within the configured threshold.
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716BE80DAEB0EE2A6A5D1F5949D2@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
The test assumes that a backend will execute COMMIT PREPARED on the
publisher and hit the injection point commit-after-delay-checkpoint within
the commit critical section. This should cause the apply worker on the
subscriber to wait for the transaction to complete.
However, the test does not guarantee that the injection point is actually
triggered, creating a race condition where the apply worker may proceed
prematurely during COMMIT PREPARED.
This commit resolves the issue by explicitly waiting for the injection
point to be hit before continuing with the test, ensuring consistent and
reliable behavior.
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TY4PR01MB1690751D1CA8C128B0770EC6F9409A@TY4PR01MB16907.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
A test has been added to ensure that conflict-relevant data is not
prematurely removed when a concurrent prepared transaction is being
committed on the publisher.
This test introduces an injection point that simulates the presence of a
prepared transaction in the commit phase, validating that the system
correctly delays conflict slot advancement until the transaction is fully
committed.
Additionally, the test serves as a safeguard for developers, ensuring that
the acquisition of the commit timestamp does not occur before marking
DELAY_CHKPT_IN_COMMIT in RecordTransactionCommitPrepared.
Reported-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS9PR01MB16913F67856B0DA2A909788129400A@OS9PR01MB16913.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
This commit fixes three issues:
1) When a disabled subscription is created with retain_dead_tuples set to true,
the launcher is not woken up immediately, which may lead to delays in creating
the conflict detection slot.
Creating the conflict detection slot is essential even when the subscription is
not enabled. This ensures that dead tuples are retained, which is necessary for
accurately identifying the type of conflict during replication.
2) Conflict-related data was unnecessarily retained when the subscription does
not have a table.
3) Conflict-relevant data could be prematurely removed before applying
prepared transactions on the publisher that are in the commit critical section.
This issue occurred because the backend executing COMMIT PREPARED was not
accounted for during the computation of oldestXid in the commit phase on
the publisher. As a result, the subscriber could advance the conflict
slot's xmin without waiting for such COMMIT PREPARED transactions to
complete.
We fixed this issue by identifying prepared transactions that are in the
commit critical section during computation of oldestXid in commit phase.
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS9PR01MB16913DACB64E5721872AA5C02943BA@OS9PR01MB16913.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS9PR01MB16913F67856B0DA2A909788129400A@OS9PR01MB16913.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
This commit introduces a new subscription parameter,
max_retention_duration, aimed at mitigating excessive accumulation of dead
tuples when retain_dead_tuples is enabled and the apply worker lags behind
the publisher.
When the time spent advancing a non-removable transaction ID exceeds the
max_retention_duration threshold, the apply worker will stop retaining
conflict detection information. In such cases, the conflict slot's xmin
will be set to InvalidTransactionId, provided that all apply workers
associated with the subscription (with retain_dead_tuples enabled) confirm
the retention duration has been exceeded.
To ensure retention status persists across server restarts, a new column
subretentionactive has been added to the pg_subscription catalog. This
prevents unnecessary reactivation of retention logic after a restart.
The conflict detection slot will not be automatically re-initialized
unless a new subscription is created with retain_dead_tuples = true, or
the user manually re-enables retain_dead_tuples.
A future patch will introduce support for automatic slot re-initialization
once at least one apply worker confirms that the retention duration is
within the configured max_retention_duration.
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716BE80DAEB0EE2A6A5D1F5949D2@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
Use "row" instead of "tuple" for user-facing information for
logical replication conflicts.
|
|
The DROP SUBSCRIPTION command performs several operations: it stops the
subscription workers, removes subscription-related entries from system
catalogs, and deletes the replication slot on the publisher server.
Previously, this command acquired an AccessExclusiveLock on
pg_subscription before initiating these steps.
However, while holding this lock, the command attempts to connect to the
publisher to remove the replication slot. In cases where the connection is
made to a newly created database on the same server as subscriber, the
cache-building process during connection tries to acquire an
AccessShareLock on pg_subscription, resulting in a self-deadlock.
To resolve this issue, we reduce the lock level on pg_subscription during
DROP SUBSCRIPTION from AccessExclusiveLock to RowExclusiveLock. Earlier,
the higher lock level was used to prevent the launcher from starting a new
worker during the drop operation, as a restarted worker could become
orphaned.
Now, instead of relying on a strict lock, we acquire an AccessShareLock on
the specific subscription being dropped and re-validate its existence
after acquiring the lock. If the subscription is no longer valid, the
worker exits gracefully. This approach avoids the deadlock while still
ensuring that orphan workers are not created.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Author: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18988-7312c868be2d467f@postgresql.org
|
|
This enhancement builds upon the infrastructure introduced in commit
228c370868, which enables the preservation of deleted tuples and their
origin information on the subscriber. This capability is crucial for
handling concurrent transactions replicated from remote nodes.
The update introduces support for detecting update_deleted conflicts
during the application of update operations on the subscriber. When an
update operation fails to locate the target row-typically because it has
been concurrently deleted-we perform an additional table scan. This scan
uses the SnapshotAny mechanism and we do this additional scan only when
the retain_dead_tuples option is enabled for the relevant subscription.
The goal of this scan is to locate the most recently deleted tuple-matching
the old column values from the remote update-that has not yet been removed
by VACUUM and is still visible according to our slot (i.e., its deletion
is not older than conflict-detection-slot's xmin). If such a tuple is
found, the system reports an update_deleted conflict, including the origin
and transaction details responsible for the deletion.
This provides a groundwork for more robust and accurate conflict
resolution process, preventing unexpected behavior by correctly
identifying cases where a remote update clashes with a deletion from
another origin.
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716BE80DAEB0EE2A6A5D1F5949D2@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
Ensure the test waits for the apply worker to exit after disabling the
subscription. This is necessary to safely enable the retain_dead_tuples
option. Also added a similar wait in another part of the test to prevent
unintended apply worker activity that could lead to test failures
post-subscription disable.
Reported by Michael Paquier as per cfbot.
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aIGLgfRJIBwExoPj@paquier.xyz
|
|
Logical replication requires reliable conflict detection to maintain data
consistency across nodes. To achieve this, we must prevent premature
removal of tuples deleted by other origins and their associated commit_ts
data by VACUUM, which could otherwise lead to incorrect conflict reporting
and resolution.
This patch introduces a mechanism to retain deleted tuples on the
subscriber during the application of concurrent transactions from remote
nodes. Retaining these tuples allows us to correctly ignore concurrent
updates to the same tuple. Without this, an UPDATE might be misinterpreted
as an INSERT during resolutions due to the absence of the original tuple.
Additionally, we ensure that origin metadata is not prematurely removed by
vacuum freeze, which is essential for detecting update_origin_differs and
delete_origin_differs conflicts.
To support this, a new replication slot named pg_conflict_detection is
created and maintained by the launcher on the subscriber. Each apply
worker tracks its own non-removable transaction ID, which the launcher
aggregates to determine the appropriate xmin for the slot, thereby
retaining necessary tuples.
Conflict information retention (deleted tuples and commit_ts) can be
enabled per subscription via the retain_conflict_info option. This is
disabled by default to avoid unnecessary overhead for configurations that
do not require conflict resolution or logging.
During upgrades, if any subscription on the old cluster has
retain_conflict_info enabled, a conflict detection slot will be created to
protect relevant tuples from deletion when the new cluster starts.
This is a foundational work to correctly detect update_deleted conflict
which will be done in a follow-up patch.
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716BE80DAEB0EE2A6A5D1F5949D2@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
This is required before the creation of a new branch. pgindent is
clean, as well as is reformat-dat-files.
perltidy version is v20230309, as documented in pgindent's README.
|
|
|
|
The test did not wait for all the subscriptions to have caught up when
dropping the subscription "tab_copy". In a slow environment, it could
be possible for the replay of the COMMIT PREPARED transaction "mygid"
to not be confirmed yet, causing one prepared transaction to be left
around before moving to the next steps of the test.
One failure noticed is a transaction found in pg_prepared_xacts for the
cases where copy_data = false and two_phase = true, but there should be
none after dropping the subscription.
As an extra safety measure, a check is added before dropping the
subscription, scanning pg_prepared_xacts to make sure that no prepared
transactions are left once both subscriptions have caught up.
Issue introduced by a8fd13cab0ba, fixing a problem similar to
eaf5321c3524.
Per buildfarm member kestrel.
Author: Vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm329QaZ+bwU--bW6GjbNSZ8-38cDE8QWofafub7NV67oA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
|
|
After executing ALTER SUBSCRIPTION tap_sub SET PUBLICATION, we did not
wait for the new walsender process to restart. As a result, an INSERT
executed immediately after the ALTER could be decoded and skipped,
considering it is not part of any subscribed publication. And, the old
apply worker could also confirm the LSN of such an INSERT. This could
cause the replication to resume from a point after the INSERT. In such
cases, we miss the expected warning about the missing publication.
To fix this, ensure the walsender has restarted before continuing after
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
Reported-by: Tom Lane as per CI
Author: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1230066.1745992333@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Commit 3f28b2fcac tried to ensure that the replication origin shouldn't be
advanced in case of an ERROR in the apply worker, so that it can request
the same data again after restart. However, it is possible that an ERROR
was caught and handled by a (say PL/pgSQL) function, and the apply worker
continues to apply further changes, in which case, we shouldn't reset the
replication origin.
Ensure to reset the origin only when the apply worker exits after an
ERROR.
Commit 3f28b2fcac added new function geterrlevel, which we removed in HEAD
as part of this commit, but kept it in backbranches to avoid breaking any
applications. A separate case can be made to have such a function even for
HEAD.
Reported-by: Shawn McCoy <shawn.the.mccoy@gmail.com>
Author: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 16, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALsgZNCGARa2mcYNVTSj9uoPcJo-tPuWUGECReKpNgTpo31_Pw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
exec_replication_command created a cmd_context to work in and
then deleted it on exit. This is pretty dangerous because
some replication commands start/finish transactions. In the
wake of commit 1afe31f03, that could lead to re-selecting a
CurrentMemoryContext that's already been deleted, leading to
hilarity such as a memory context that is its own parent.
To fix, let's make the cmd_context persist across
exec_replication_command calls; instead of deleting it, we'll just
reset it each time. In this way it retains the same identity and
there's no problem if transaction abort restores it as the working
context. It probably even saves a few microseconds to do this.
This fix also ensures that exec_replication_command returns to the
caller (PostgresMain) with the same context active that had been
when it was called (probably MessageContext). The previous
coding could get that wrong too.
Reported-by: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com>
Author: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAO6_XqoJA7-_G6t7Uqe5nWF3nj+QBGn4F6Ptp=rUGDr0zo+KvA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The large majority of these have been introduced by recent commits done
in the v18 development cycle.
Author: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9a7763ab-5252-429d-a943-b28941e0e28b@gmail.com
|
|
The issue happens when building conflict information during apply of
INSERT or UPDATE operations that violate unique constraints on leaf
partitions.
The problem was introduced in commit 9ff68679b5, which removed the
redundant calls to ExecOpenIndices/ExecCloseIndices. The previous code was
relying on the redundant ExecOpenIndices call in
apply_handle_tuple_routing() to build the index information required for
unique key conflict detection.
The fix is to delay building the index information until a conflict is
detected instead of relying on ExecOpenIndices to do the same. The
additional benefit of this approach is that it avoids building index
information when there is no conflict.
Author: Hou Zhijie <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by:Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TYAPR01MB57244ADA33DDA57119B9D26494A62@TYAPR01MB5724.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
WAL senders do not flush their statistics until they exit, limiting the
monitoring possible for live processes. This is penalizing when WAL
senders are running for a long time, like in streaming or logical
replication setups, because it is not possible to know the amount of IO
they generate while running.
This commit makes WAL senders more aggressive with their statistics
flush, using an internal of 1 second, with the flush timing calculated
based on the existing GetCurrentTimestamp() done before the sleeps done
to wait for some activity. Note that the sleep done for logical and
physical WAL senders happens in two different code paths, so the stats
flushes need to happen in these two places.
One test is added for the physical WAL sender case, and one for the
logical WAL sender case. This can be done in a stable fashion by
relying on the WAL generated by the TAP tests in combination with a
stats reset while a server is running, but only on HEAD as WAL data has
been added to pg_stat_io in a051e71e28a1.
This issue exists since a9c70b46dbe and the introduction of pg_stat_io,
so backpatch down to v16.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Z73IsKBceoVd4t55@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Backpatch-through: 16
|
|
The problem is that after the ALTER SUBSCRIPTION tap_sub SET PUBLICATION
command, we didn't wait for the new walsender to start on the publisher.
Immediately after ALTER, we performed Insert and expected it to replicate.
However, the replication could start from a point after the INSERT location,
and as the subscription isn't copying initial data, we could miss such an
Insert.
The fix is to wait for connection to be established between publisher and
subscriber before starting DML operations that are expected to replicate.
As per CI.
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm2ms1deM5EYNLFEfESv_Kw=Y4AiTB0LP=qGS-UpFwGbPg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Author: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm2ms1deM5EYNLFEfESv_Kw=Y4AiTB0LP=qGS-UpFwGbPg@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABdArM7FW-_dnthGkg2s0fy1HhUB8C3ELA0gZX1kkbs1ZZoV3Q@mail.gmail.com
|
|
We haven't had bugs in this area, but there's some not-entirely
trivial code to detect that case, so it seems good to have test
coverage for it.
Author: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPtX8P0EGhsk9p%3DhQGUHrzxeCSzANXSMKOvYiLX-EjdyNw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Introduce a new conflict type, multiple_unique_conflicts, to handle cases
where an incoming row during logical replication violates multiple UNIQUE
constraints.
Previously, the apply worker detected and reported only the first
encountered key conflict (insert_exists/update_exists), causing repeated
failures as each constraint violation needs to be handled one by one
making the process slow and error-prone.
With this patch, the apply worker checks all unique constraints upfront
once the first key conflict is detected and reports
multiple_unique_conflicts if multiple violations exist. This allows users
to resolve all conflicts at once by deleting all conflicting tuples rather
than dealing with them individually or skipping the transaction.
In the future, this will also allow us to specify different resolution
handlers for such a conflict type.
Add the stats for this conflict type in pg_stat_subscription_stats.
Author: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABdArM7FW-_dnthGkg2s0fy1HhUB8C3ELA0gZX1kkbs1ZZoV3Q@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The problem is that ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SET PUBLICATION ... will lead
to restarting of apply worker and after the restart, the apply worker will
use the existing slot and replication origin corresponding to the
subscription. Now, it is possible that before the restart, the origin has
not been updated, and the WAL start location points to a location before
where PUBLICATION pointed to by SET PUBLICATION doesn't exist, and that
can lead to an error like: "ERROR: publication "pub1" does not exist".
Once this error occurs, apply worker will never be able to proceed and
will always return the same error.
We decided to skip loading the publication if the publication does not
exist. The publication is loaded later and updates the relation entry when
the publication gets created.
We decided not to backpatch this as this is a behaviour change, and we don't
see field reports. This problem has been found by intermittent buildfarm
failures.
Author: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/CALDaNm0-n8FGAorM%2BbTxkzn%2BAOUyx5%3DL_XmnvOP6T24%2B-NcBKg%40mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1+T-ETXeRM4DHWzGxBpKafLCp__5bPA_QZfFQp7-0wj4Q@mail.gmail.com
|
|
On Publication rename, we need to only invalidate the RelationSyncCache
entries corresponding to relations that are part of the publication being
renamed.
As part of this patch, we introduce a new invalidation message to
invalidate the cache maintained by the logical decoding output plugin. We
can't use existing relcache invalidation for this purpose, as that would
unnecessarily cause relcache invalidations in other backends.
This will improve performance by building fewer relation cache entries
during logical replication.
Author: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Author: Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hou Zhijie <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSCPR01MB14966C09AA201EFFA706576A7F5C92@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
Previously, a WARNING was issued at the time of defining a subscription
with origin=NONE only when the publisher subscribed to the same table from
other publishers, indicating potential data origination from different
origins. However, the publisher can subscribe to the partition ancestors
or partition children of the table from other publishers, which could also
result in mixed-origin data inclusion. So, give a WARNING in those cases
as well.
Reported-by: Sergey Tatarintsev <s.tatarintsev@postgrespro.ru>
Author: Hou Zhijie <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Author: Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 16, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5eda6a9c-63cf-404d-8a49-8dcb116a29f3@postgrespro.ru
|
|
Logical replication crashes if the subscriber's partitioned table
has a BRIN index. There are two independently blamable causes,
and this patch fixes both:
1. brininsertcleanup fails if called twice for the same IndexInfo,
because it half-destroys its BrinInsertState but leaves it still
linked from ii_AmCache. brininsert would also fail in that state,
so it's pretty hard to see any advantage to this coding. Fully
remove the BrinInsertState, instead, so that a new brininsert
call would create a new cache.
2. A logical replication subscriber sometimes does ExecOpenIndices
twice on the same ResultRelInfo, followed by doing ExecCloseIndices
twice; the second call reaches the brininsertcleanup bug. Quite
aside from tickling unexpected cases in aminsertcleanup methods,
this seems very wasteful, because the IndexInfos built in the
first ExecOpenIndices call are just lost during the second call,
and have to be rebuilt at possibly-nontrivial cost. We should
establish a coding rule that you don't do that.
The problematic coding is that when the target table is partitioned,
apply_handle_tuple_routing calls ExecFindPartition which does
ExecOpenIndices (and expects that ExecCleanupTupleRouting will
close the indexes again). Using the ResultRelInfo made by
ExecFindPartition, it calls apply_handle_delete_internal or
apply_handle_insert_internal, both of which think they need to do
ExecOpenIndices/ExecCloseIndices for themselves. They do in the main
non-partitioned code paths, but not here. The simplest fix is to pull
their ExecOpenIndices/ExecCloseIndices calls out and put them in the
call sites for the non-partitioned cases. (We could have refactored
apply_handle_update_internal similarly, but I did not do so today
because there's no bug there: the partitioned code path doesn't
call it.)
Also, remove the always-duplicative open/close calls within
apply_handle_tuple_routing itself.
Since brininsertcleanup and indeed the whole aminsertcleanup mechanism
are new in v17, there's no observable bug in older branches. A case
could be made for trying to avoid these duplicative open/close calls
in the older branches, but for now it seems not worth the trouble and
risk of new bugs.
Bug: #18815
Reported-by: Sergey Belyashov <sergey.belyashov@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18815-2a0407cc7f40b327@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 17
|
|
This adds a new variant of generated columns that are computed on read
(like a view, unlike the existing stored generated columns, which are
computed on write, like a materialized view).
The syntax for the column definition is
... GENERATED ALWAYS AS (...) VIRTUAL
and VIRTUAL is also optional. VIRTUAL is the default rather than
STORED to match various other SQL products. (The SQL standard makes
no specification about this, but it also doesn't know about VIRTUAL or
STORED.) (Also, virtual views are the default, rather than
materialized views.)
Virtual generated columns are stored in tuples as null values. (A
very early version of this patch had the ambition to not store them at
all. But so much stuff breaks or gets confused if you have tuples
where a column in the middle is completely missing. This is a
compromise, and it still saves space over being forced to use stored
generated columns. If we ever find a way to improve this, a bit of
pg_upgrade cleverness could allow for upgrades to a newer scheme.)
The capabilities and restrictions of virtual generated columns are
mostly the same as for stored generated columns. In some cases, this
patch keeps virtual generated columns more restricted than they might
technically need to be, to keep the two kinds consistent. Some of
that could maybe be relaxed later after separate careful
considerations.
Some functionality that is currently not supported, but could possibly
be added as incremental features, some easier than others:
- index on or using a virtual column
- hence also no unique constraints on virtual columns
- extended statistics on virtual columns
- foreign-key constraints on virtual columns
- not-null constraints on virtual columns (check constraints are supported)
- ALTER TABLE / DROP EXPRESSION
- virtual column cannot have domain type
- virtual columns are not supported in logical replication
The tests in generated_virtual.sql have been copied over from
generated_stored.sql with the keyword replaced. This way we can make
sure the behavior is mostly aligned, and the differences can be
visible. Some tests for currently not supported features are
currently commented out.
Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/a368248e-69e4-40be-9c07-6c3b5880b0a6@eisentraut.org
|
|
The current boolean publish_generated_columns option only supports a
binary choice, which is insufficient for future enhancements where
generated columns can be of different types (e.g., stored or virtual). The
supported values for the publish_generated_columns option are 'none' and
'stored'.
Author: Vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d718d219-dd47-4a33-bb97-56e8fc4da994@eisentraut.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/B80D17B2-2C8E-4C7D-87F2-E5B4BE3C069E@gmail.com
|
|
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
This covers some cases that were previously failing before the
"Support for GiST in get_equal_strategy_number()" patch.
Author: Paul A. Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA+renyUApHgSZF9-nd-a0+OPGharLQLO=mDHcY4_qQ0+noCUVg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Ensure stored generated columns that are part of REPLICA IDENTITY must be
published explicitly for UPDATE and DELETE operations to be published. We
can publish generated columns by listing them in the column list or by
enabling the publish_generated_columns option.
This commit changes the behavior of the test added in commit adedf54e65 by
giving an ERROR for the UPDATE operation in such cases. There is no way to
trigger the bug reported in commit adedf54e65 but we didn't remove the
corresponding code change because it is still relevant when replicating
changes from a publisher with version less than 18.
We decided not to backpatch this behavior change to avoid the risk of
breaking existing output plugins that may be sending generated columns by
default although we are not aware of any such plugin. Also, we didn't see
any reports related to this on STABLE branches which is another reason not
to backpatch this change.
Author: Shlok Kyal, Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Vignesh C, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANhcyEVw4V2Awe2AB6i0E5AJLNdASShGfdBLbUd1XtWDboymCA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The test case was incorrectly matching the error code.
Author: Vignesh C
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm0C5LPiTxkdqsxiyeaL=nuUP8t6ne81sp9jE0=MFz=-ew@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Currently, logical replication produces a generic error message when
targeting a subscriber-side table column that is either missing or
generated. The error message can be misleading for generated columns.
This patch introduces a specific error message to clarify the issue when
generated columns are involved.
Author: Shubham Khanna
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith, Vignesh C, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHv8RjJBvYtqU7OAofBizOmQOK2Q8h+w9v2_cQWxT_gO7er3Aw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This patch builds on the work done in commit 745217a051 by enabling the
replication of generated columns alongside regular column changes through
a new publication parameter: publish_generated_columns.
Example usage:
CREATE PUBLICATION pub1 FOR TABLE tab_gencol WITH (publish_generated_columns = true);
The column list takes precedence. If the generated columns are specified
in the column list, they will be replicated even if
'publish_generated_columns' is set to false. Conversely, if generated
columns are not included in the column list (assuming the user specifies a
column list), they will not be replicated even if
'publish_generated_columns' is true.
Author: Vignesh C, Shubham Khanna
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith, Amit Kapila, Hayato Kuroda, Shlok Kyal, Ajin Cherian, Hou Zhijie, Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/B80D17B2-2C8E-4C7D-87F2-E5B4BE3C069E@gmail.com
|
|
This commit allows logical replication to publish and replicate generated
columns when explicitly listed in the column list. We also ensured that
the generated columns were copied during the initial tablesync when they
were published.
We will allow to replicate generated columns even when they are not
specified in the column list (via a new publication option) in a separate
commit.
The motivation of this work is to allow replication for cases where the
client doesn't have generated columns. For example, the case where one is
trying to replicate data from Postgres to the non-Postgres database.
Author: Shubham Khanna, Vignesh C, Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith, Hayato Kuroda, Shlok Kyal, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/B80D17B2-2C8E-4C7D-87F2-E5B4BE3C069E@gmail.com
|
|
Previously the default value of streaming option for a subscription was
'off'. The parallel option indicates that the changes in large
transactions (greater than logical_decoding_work_mem) are to be applied
directly via one of the parallel apply workers, if available.
The parallel mode was introduced in 16, but we refrain from enabling it by
default to avoid seeing any unpleasant behavior in the existing
applications. However we haven't found any such report yet, so this is a
good time to enable it by default.
Reported-by: Vignesh C
Author: Hayato Kuroda, Masahiko Sawada, Peter Smith, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm1=MedhW23NuoePJTmonwsMSp80ddsw+sEJs0GUMC_kqQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This commit adds columns in view pg_stat_subscription_stats to show the
number of times a particular conflict type has occurred during the
application of logical replication changes. The following columns are
added:
confl_insert_exists:
Number of times a row insertion violated a NOT DEFERRABLE unique
constraint.
confl_update_origin_differs:
Number of times an update was performed on a row that was
previously modified by another origin.
confl_update_exists:
Number of times that the updated value of a row violates a
NOT DEFERRABLE unique constraint.
confl_update_missing:
Number of times that the tuple to be updated is missing.
confl_delete_origin_differs:
Number of times a delete was performed on a row that was
previously modified by another origin.
confl_delete_missing:
Number of times that the tuple to be deleted is missing.
The update_origin_differs and delete_origin_differs conflicts can be
detected only when track_commit_timestamp is enabled.
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Shveta Malik, Peter Smith, Anit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB57160A07BD575773045FC214948F2@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
