| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This commit adds a new column, seq_sync_error_count, to the
pg_stat_subscription_stats view. This counter tracks the number of errors
encountered by the sequence synchronization worker during operation.
Since a single worker handles the synchronization of all sequences, this
value may reflect errors from multiple sequences. This addition improves
observability of sequence synchronization behavior and helps monitor
potential issues during replication.
Author: Vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1LC+KJiAkSrpE_NwvNdidw9F2os7GERUeSxSKv71gXysQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Test failure on buildfarm member prion:
The test failed due to an unexpected LOCATION: line appearing between the
WARNING and ERROR messages. This occurred because the prion machine uses
log_error_verbosity = verbose, which includes additional context in error
messages. The test was originally checking for both WARNING and ERROR
messages in sequence sync, but the extra LOCATION: line disrupted this
pattern. To make the test robust across different verbosity settings, it
now only checks for the presence of the WARNING message after the test,
which is sufficient to validate the intended behavior.
Failure to sync sequences with quoted names:
The previous implementation did not correctly quote sequence names when
querying remote information, leading to failures when quoted sequence
names were used. This fix ensures that sequence names are properly quoted
during remote queries, allowing sequences with quoted identifiers to be
synced correctly.
Author: Vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Author: Shinya Kato <shinya11.kato@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm0WcdSCoNPiE-5ek4J2dMJ5o111GPTzKCYj9G5i=ONYtQ@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOzEurQOSN=Zcp9uVnatNbAy=2WgMTJn_DYszYjv0KUeQX_e_A@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This patch introduces sequence synchronization. Sequences that are synced
will have 2 states:
- INIT (needs [re]synchronizing)
- READY (is already synchronized)
A new sequencesync worker is launched as needed to synchronize sequences.
A single sequencesync worker is responsible for synchronizing all
sequences. It begins by retrieving the list of sequences that are flagged
for synchronization, i.e., those in the INIT state. These sequences are
then processed in batches, allowing multiple entries to be synchronized
within a single transaction. The worker fetches the current sequence
values and page LSNs from the remote publisher, updates the corresponding
sequences on the local subscriber, and finally marks each sequence as
READY upon successful synchronization.
Sequence synchronization occurs in 3 places:
1) CREATE SUBSCRIPTION
- The command syntax remains unchanged.
- The subscriber retrieves sequences associated with publications.
- Published sequences are added to pg_subscription_rel with INIT
state.
- Initiate the sequencesync worker to synchronize all sequences.
2) ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH PUBLICATION
- The command syntax remains unchanged.
- Dropped published sequences are removed from pg_subscription_rel.
- Newly published sequences are added to pg_subscription_rel with INIT
state.
- Initiate the sequencesync worker to synchronize only newly added
sequences.
3) ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH SEQUENCES
- A new command introduced for PG19 by f0b3573c3a.
- All sequences in pg_subscription_rel are reset to INIT state.
- Initiate the sequencesync worker to synchronize all sequences.
- Unlike "ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH PUBLICATION" command,
addition and removal of missing sequences will not be done in this
case.
Author: Vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hou Zhijie <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1LC+KJiAkSrpE_NwvNdidw9F2os7GERUeSxSKv71gXysQ@mail.gmail.com
|
